News 
 Local News 
 Sport 
 Football - Soccer 
 Northern legal battle headed for extra time 

Northern legal battle headed for extra time

07 Feb, 2012 03:00 AM
THE return of David Eland as chief executive officer yesterday is unfortunately not the end of a messy and costly saga for Northern NSW Football.

The sacking of interim CEO Jock Graham and a looming dispute over legal fees incurred by the former board which hired him are set to extend the drama, which started when Eland was axed on October 30 last year.

Graham would not comment on the termination of his contract yesterday.

But the Herald has been told Graham has sought legal advice over the action.

Graham, who was announced as the interim CEO on November 3, last week received a termination letter from the new board which was accompanied by a cheque.

The payment did not cover the full amount of his six-month deal, reported to be worth $67,000, but was more than for just time served in the role. It is believed Graham had not previously been paid by NNSWF.

The other looming dispute is over the legal fees owed to Colin W Love & Co, which represented the NNSWF board in its battle with disgruntled members after the axing of Eland.

The Herald has been told the Sydney law firm has sent a letter of demand to NNSWF over the debt, believed to be about $20,000.

However, it is believed the new board has sought legal advice over who is liable for the debt and that it may claim former directors Peter Moore, Greg Wilson, Richard Face and Andrew Robertson are responsible for the fees.

Moore, Wilson and Robertson resigned before facing motions to remove them from office at the annual general meeting last month. Face was voted off the board.

New NNSWF chairman Bill Walker, who resigned as a director when Eland was sacked, would not comment on the two legal situations.

The legal costs for members who fought to remove and replace the board responsible for sacking Eland are to be shared between the seven zone bodies of NNSWF.

Another financial factor for NNSWF from the saga was the six-figure severance package made to Eland.

The Herald has been told Eland will not keep the six months of severance pay but will be compensated for his time out of the job.

Print
Increase Text Size
Decrease Text Size

comments


Date: Newest first | Oldest first
While none of this was unexpected by the football community the reality is Moore/Face/Wilson/Robertson have achieved nothing more than spending well over $100,000 of local childrens registration fees.

And still lost.

Morally, I believe they should be held accountable for every cent of the legal fees on both sides. Legally... who knows.

But at the end of the day it is the local juniors currently registering who have paid these termination payments and legal bills.


Posted by demon_aus, 7/02/2012 7:33:21 AM, on The Herald
Hard to believe that Jock Graham would demand $67,000 of player registration fees for doing very little except fight for the survival of the four directors who appointed him.
Posted by Gobsmacked, 7/02/2012 12:43:03 PM, on The Herald
What a disgrace that Jock graham should even command a fraction of what he was paid- contract or no! He knew he could never really be the CEO - and his actions highlighted this.

It appears that he has about as much integrity as the directors who were expelled from NNSWF.

Posted by Trevor, 7/02/2012 3:49:07 PM, on The Herald
Jock should take only for the time he was working. Remember that the money raised by the Federation comes from raffle tickets and fees our children pay to play the beautiful game.
Posted by Charles, 7/02/2012 5:45:38 PM, on The Herald
Jock done his job and should be compensated. The new board have done to Jock what everyone cried about the old board doing to Eland. Explain the difference
Posted by just_me, 7/02/2012 8:33:43 PM, on The Herald
@just_me - Jock doesn't need compensation. He was given a contract by Peter Moore & co., without a mandate from the Members. Jock took on the role as a "mercenary" does, knowing that he was doing the dirty work of the unwanted directors. He did not go through the process of applying for a job,there was no advertisement, interview process, nothing that transparent. The only reason Graham was employed by Moore & co. was to thwart any efforts to have David Eland reinstated. Their plan didn't work.
Posted by John S, 7/02/2012 9:39:39 PM, on The Herald
@just_me ..... if you do not understand the vast difference between David Eland's and Jock Graham's achievements then I believe you have no idea of what has taken place at the Federation over the last few months.
Posted by Nic, 7/02/2012 11:39:34 PM, on The Herald
This bloke new the situation he was getting involed in. The board then were advised not to employ anyone. These blokes have never had the intrest of soccer in Northern NSW.
Posted by spectator, 8/02/2012 6:48:55 AM, on The Herald

post a comment


Screen name  *
Email address  *
Remember me?
Comment  *
 
We invite and encourage our readers to post comments. Comments are moderated and will appear as soon as our editor has approved them. When posting comments you agree to be bound by our Terms and Conditions.
DISPUTE: Jock Graham
DISPUTE: Jock Graham

Most popular articles


 
 
 


Newcastle Herald







Weather brought to you by:

Weatherzone

Classifieds

Front Page

Current Issue
Privacy Policy | Conditions of Use | Advertising Terms | Copyright © 2012. Fairfax Media.
 SEND...
 SAVE...
 SHARE...