News 
 Local News 
 Sport 
 Rugby League 
 Dragons defeat true reflection of Knights' inability to maintain rage 

Dragons defeat true reflection of Knights' inability to maintain rage

30 Aug, 2010 05:00 AM
IT was a game that encapsulated the Newcastle Knights' season.

A slow start.

A seemingly unassailable deficit.

A belated never-say-die fightback and moments of scintillating attack just when all hope seemed lost.

A brief surge of belief among the Novocastrian faithful that a miracle might be about to unfold.

And ultimately a disappointing anti-climax. A reality check that reminded everyone of the gulf between pretenders and contenders.

Saturday's 26-18 loss to St George Illawarra may have been the result that put Newcastle out of their misery, but at least the Knights did not surrender without a fight.

Down 22-0 after 45 minutes against the premiership favourites, a lesser team may well have capitulated.

That Newcastle were able to hit back with three tries in seven minutes against the NRL's best defensive unit spoke volumes for their resilience and skill level.

Only three teams this season - Manly, the Warriors and Canberra - have scored more than 18 points in a game against Wayne Bennett's back-to-back minor premiers.

But if Newcastle's second-half revival brought the 23,148-strong crowd - the largest at EnergyAustralia Stadium for two years - to fever pitch, it also highlighted their reputation as the NRL's greatest enigmas.

At their best, the Knights are capable of carving up any team with speed, power and ball movement.

They had the mighty Dragons worried, make no mistake.

But too often this season Newcastle have been guilty of inexplicable lapses that cost them tries and competition points.

As Knights coach Rick Stone admitted ruefully on Saturday night: "You've got to be consistent over 26 weeks to get enough wins to get into the semis.

"We let ourselves down here a few times earlier in the season.

"There could have been easily four games we won, just off the top of my head.

"But look, I'm not going to harp on that until I get to the end of the year and do a full review of the season."

Any analysis of a season that is clinically dead before Sunday's daunting final-round visit to Melbourne must start with the well-documented departures of Danny Wicks and Chris Houston.

Only the players, coaching staff and club insiders know how much the drugs scandal, which remains unresolved, has affected their on-field performances. It cast a dark shadow that has hung over their whole season.

The Wicks-Houston affair has not been the only adversity the footballing gods have tossed at Newcastle.

Skipper Kurt Gidley was sidelined in the early rounds with injury. Veteran Steve Simpson lasted just eight games before a chronic knee problem forced him to retire.

Evarn Tuimavave, Cory Paterson, James McManus and Ben Rogers suffered season-ending setbacks at various stages.

But the bottom line is the Knights should have done better, and they know it.

The majority of Stone's squad have been together for the past three years, and after finishing ninth in 2008 and seventh last year, it was realistic to assume they could at least make the finals.

Instead, 2010 has to be regarded as a step backwards.

Last season, they won 13 games despite the upheaval caused by a late-season change of coaches.

This year they have won 10, and only their most parochial fans would believe they can make that 11 on Sunday.

After losing four of their first five games, they were always playing catch-up.

Three consecutive wins against Parramatta, Gold Coast and Cronulla gave them a glimmer of hope, but it faded abruptly after a 52-18 hammering from Canberra in round 19.

After an impressive round-one win against the Bulldogs, the Knights have spent the rest of their campaign languishing with the also-rans.

Occasionally they played to their potential and produced a brand of football that any team would be happy to call their own.

But the harsh truth is that when the finals kick off in two weeks' time, the Knights will be spectators because they do not deserve to be participants.

Print
Increase Text Size
Decrease Text Size

comments


Date: Newest first | Oldest first
Its got to be the coaching, give Stone till round 6 next season and if he is not at least 4 from 6 its time for him and his coaching staff to be shown the door
Posted by dogs, 30/08/2010 8:31:46 AM, on The Herald
In a "nut shell" Robert Dillion!
Posted by Hans Murdok, 30/08/2010 11:11:16 AM, on The Herald
7 consecutive penalties and quite a few shonky Shane Hayneisms allowed Knights second half comeback. This has become more and more prevalent in recent matches. Finals could well be decided by referees rather than players. Sad indictment on the game with the stench of "betting" stings permeating the NRL. Hard to find any real credibility.
Posted by Unbiased, 30/08/2010 12:20:34 PM, on The Herald
Blah, Blah. A loss is loss no matter how much you try and dress it up!
Posted by Casper the unfriendly ghost, 30/08/2010 4:42:46 PM, on The Herald
dodgy penalties allowed the dragons to get away in the first half.
Posted by macavity, 30/08/2010 4:57:01 PM, on The Herald
Robert you have made a major omission from your match report. There is no mention of Steve Burraston slamming the poor refereeing as the reason for the Knights defeat.
Posted by Steve, 30/08/2010 5:04:06 PM, on The Herald
To the user 'Unbiased': What does this article have to do with the totally unrelated Bulldogs/Cowboys incident? Sounds like your just trying to throw mud at the NRL in general to further some self-serving agenda o.o In response to the article - The few games we led early in the season then threw away are what have cost us a spot in the finals, without a doubt. Here's hoping Stone and the boys can have a drama/injury-free off-season and put in some good performances next year.
Posted by Lb, 30/08/2010 5:41:56 PM, on The Herald
Shouldn't really leave it up to the last few games and other results to go your way to cement a finals spot.Saturdays game was an all too familiar performance from the Knights brilliant for ten minutes,competitive for twenty minutes but disorganised and disinterested for fifty minutes.These inconsistant efforts were far too frquent during 2010 for there to be any complaints about match officials causing all their problems.In all fairness to Rick Stone I think he was thrown into the job at the very least 12 months before he expected so he deserves a little more time to find his feet and put his own stamp on the team.
Posted by Spinachbiscuit, 30/08/2010 6:48:33 PM, on The Herald
@dogs i agree with you... SACK RICK STONE And get Ricky Stuart in cuz he is hopeless.
Posted by The Big Knights Fan, 5/09/2010 6:46:31 PM, on The Herald

post a comment


Screen name  *
Email address  *
Remember me?
Comment  *
 
We invite and encourage our readers to post comments. Comments are moderated and will appear as soon as our editor has approved them. When posting comments you agree to be bound by our Terms and Conditions.

Most popular articles


 
Balance Health Club-Wests Tower
 
Bounce
 
Landcom Sanctuary


Newcastle Herald







Weather brought to you by:

Weatherzone

Classifieds

Front Page

Current Issue
Privacy Policy | Conditions of Use | Advertising Terms | Copyright © 2012. Fairfax Media.
 SEND...
 SAVE...
 SHARE...