News 
 Opinion 
 Editorial 
 General 
 Five weeks to choose 

Five weeks to choose

19 Jul, 2010 05:00 AM
WITH Kevin Rudd's political blood still wet on her hands, Julia Gillard has taken the bold step of calling the federal election for Saturday, August 21.

More than once since seizing power less than four weeks ago, Ms Gillard has commented on the need to obtain a mandate from the people. To her credit, she has wasted little time in putting her leadership to the test. She has gone to the polls knowing Labor will have the hardest of fights to carry an election that should never have been the Coalition's to win.

On its record, this Labor government has not done enough to win resounding endorsement. The policies it has messed up are there for all to see. The deaths and shoddy work that flowed from the roof insulation debacle, the cost blowouts of the schools building program and the clumsy tax fight with the mining industry showed the Rudd government lacked the political ability to convert aims and ideas into coherent policy.

But perhaps most damaging of all was Mr Rudd's move to delay a decision on carbon trading, having previously described climate change as the greatest moral issue of our time. This confused the electorate, and while Ms Gillard has promised a new climate change policy, her short track record as PM has been less than sure-footed. Failing to properly consult with East Timor before roping the island nation into Labor's new refugee policy was a miscalculation that flew in the face of her pledge to get the detail right.

But for all Labor's shortcomings, the Coalition is almost certainly wrong when it says the resource industry, and not the government, saved Australia's bacon during the financial crisis of 2008. Some of the spending has undoubtedly gone awry but there is little doubt the government's fiscal stimulus and bank guarantees played crucial roles in helping Australia cope far better than Close outcome

In the Hunter, most of the attention will be focused on the marginal seat of Paterson. A redistribution means sitting Liberal member Bob Baldwin is protecting a very narrow margin but Labor's Jim Arneham will have to fight hard to knock him off.

A seat-by-seat analysis shows most of the marginals are in NSW and Queensland and this is where Ms Gillard and Opposition Leader Tony Abbott will be directing most of their campaign energy. Already, it is evident that Labor will attempt to portray Mr Abbott as a Howard-era clone who will reintroduce WorkChoices in some form or another should he win office. As much as Mr Abbott says WorkChoices is dead, he is a "conviction politician" who is unlikely to abandon a deep-seated desire to recast Labor's industrial relations laws.

Both Ms Gillard and Mr Abbott are experienced career politicians but relatively new leaders. The underwhelming impact of Mr Rudd's time at the top means Ms Gillard cannot rely on Labor's record as a call for re-election. She must win the five-week campaign and incumbency gives her a distinct advantage. Even so, the 2010 election will almost certainly be an extremely close contest.

Print
Increase Text Size
Decrease Text Size

comments


Date: Newest first | Oldest first
i am not a member of any political party but this is typical of the MSM bias towarads Labor. The resource industry, if you like it or not saved Australia from recession. The handouts of the $900.00 was poorly targeted and the majority was saved rather then spent, the home insulation, good idea in principal but attrociaously managed and as a consequence more billions need to be spent rectifying, the BER was nothing short of dismal, why not give the school the money to do what they wish with it? why did they only get the choice of a Hall, COLA or libary when many schools needed repairs, upgrades, new classrooms, or even air conditioning>? Also another inportant policy you conveniantly missed out on was the internet censorship that the labor party want to embark on. I haven't even started on their backflips and broken promises yet.
Posted by Nafe, 20/07/2010 9:23:51 AM, on The Herald
GOD HELP YOU ALL IF YOU VOTE FOR ABBOTT THE RABBIT, HE IS INSANE AND AUSTRALIA WOULD BECOME AN EMBARRESSMENT TO THE WORLD UNDER ANY GOVERNMENT HE LEAD. WE BADLY NEED STATESPERSONS TO LEAD AUSTRALIA, THE CURRENT CROP OF POLITIONS ACT LIKE KINDERGARTEN CHILDREN. AND THE MEDIA IS 50% TO BLAME. PS. I DON'T VOTE, THERE IS NOBODY WORTH WASTING MY DEMOCRATIC RIGHT ON.
Posted by 666, 20/07/2010 11:07:38 AM, on The Herald
nafe on what basis do you make your claim that the majority was saved and not spent? Source please. If you want to get money into the economy quickly then you give it to people who spend all their income. I think the approach was spot on, unlike most of the other moves made in recent times. The B.E.E."program however is a disgrace. when building infrastructure value is critical, and we are not getting it under that program. The insulation rebate was a great concept, but poorly delivered and managed. The concept gets energy saving items into homes, and delivered by the private sector should have generated competition and value for money. Sadly the governance of the scheme was quite poor
Posted by bakela, 20/07/2010 5:52:12 PM, on The Herald
thanks for that 666 my eyes are bleeding.....
Posted by judgedredd, 22/07/2010 2:17:27 PM, on The Herald

post a comment


Screen name  *
Email address  *
Remember me?
Comment  *
 
We invite and encourage our readers to post comments. Comments are moderated and will appear as soon as our editor has approved them. When posting comments you agree to be bound by our Terms and Conditions.

Most popular articles


 
Balance Health Club-Wests Tower
 
Bounce
 
Landcom Sanctuary


Newcastle Herald







Weather brought to you by:

Weatherzone

Classifieds

Front Page

Current Issue
Privacy Policy | Conditions of Use | Advertising Terms | Copyright © 2012. Fairfax Media.
 SEND...
 SAVE...
 SHARE...