News 
 Opinion 
 Letters to the Editor 
 General 
 Expand ferry services 

Expand ferry services

15 Feb, 2010 10:21 AM
MORE use could be made of the ferry service in Newcastle, given that some sections of the community are hell-bent on removing the rail service.

The ferry could pick up at Stockton, Carrington and Wickham and this would provide better travelling to the city and the beach for workers and the young and old.

If Newcastle City Council was to show foresight it could build an escalator from Wickham station to the wharf.

But in my opinion this council has let Newcastle become a woebegone town. When Mark Twain visited in 1895 he described Newcastle as "one long street, a graveyard at one end and, at the other, a gentleman's club with no gentlemen in it".

And now the whole town is dead. In my opinion the council and heritage people are killing Newcastle a little bit at a time.

Joan Cooley

Thornton

Print
Increase Text Size
Decrease Text Size

comments


Date: Newest first | Oldest first
keep the rail line in place. after broadmeadow station run it underground to newcastle. After newcastle station turn the train line under the harbour, put a station at stockton and then run a line up to williamtown airport, with a link to nelson bay in mind. not many cities are trying to remove their transport infrastructure, most are trying to extend it. think outside the square. i dont know how successful a ferry transport system would be between the nominated suburbs but it could make for a nice tourist attraction.
Posted by judgedredd, 15/02/2010 10:48:36 AM, on The Herald
Is it possible to navigate a ferry to Maitland. Could be an alternative to train travel. the ferry could have wharves at various points along the Hunter River.
Posted by intouch, 15/02/2010 10:00:29 PM, on The Herald
this council has been in place for a little over a year. I think the problems started a long long time before that
Posted by daz, 16/02/2010 9:59:42 AM, on The Herald
great idea about the escalator. do the same thing at queens wharf, and a few other locations. its not the railway line that stops people going over to the mall its the stairs
Posted by stop it, 16/02/2010 12:54:34 PM, on The Herald
great idea. if one of the average of 27 passengers decides they want to go across to stockton rather than uise the perfectly functioning ferry lets spend billions putting an underground rail line there to service 3-4 passengers. You should run a business judge. Just don't expect to make money from it with this logic.
Posted by fista, 16/02/2010 4:32:58 PM, on The Herald
im not trying to run a business. im wanting to see a public transport infrastructure built that will link the city to the airport. running it past stockton will see stockton boom and aid in the city revitalisation. didnt give it much thought really did you......
Posted by judgedredd, 18/02/2010 9:46:04 AM, on The Herald
it doesn't require much thought. 27 passengers per train, so lets expand it. Daft.
Posted by fista, 18/02/2010 11:34:39 AM, on The Herald
Agree with you on that one Fista as current users of the ferry actually get off the Ferry in Stockton and catch a Port Stephens bus as that is how low the Williamtown airport users numbers are. Why do you think the Belmont Heavy Rail line was closed for years ago= lack of numbers. The only time Williamtown is a popular destination is within School Holidays other than that good luck!
Posted by tigermoth, 18/02/2010 2:12:49 PM, on The Herald
thats 27 ferry passengers between stocko and newy.... how many more would use it if they could then go on to hamilton, broadmeadow etc??? and how many would use the train to go to the airport? or didn't you think about that one? think outside the box your in.
Posted by judgedredd, 18/02/2010 2:25:20 PM, on The Herald
The train line to Newcastle must remain open. Only myopic cities close public transport links. The rail will be more than required when the university relocates many faculties to the city. The clientele of the justice precinct will need transport to the city. Many specialist doctors and surgeons still maintain rooms in the CBD. Why remove a train that provides the needy and the elderly with an affordable link. My kids still use the train to get to Newcastle Beach from Fassifern most weekends. GPT, Aaron Buman and the doomsayers want to rip out rail at all costs. They make no plans for proper integration of rail. Might I also suggest that we rip down the rail fences while keeping the train into Newcastle. Access to the foreshore can be assured. All we need to do is what San Diego in the USA does. Slow the big trains down in the city precinct. San Diego has had few deaths or injuries in the last 18 years. They have access across heavy rail to a waterfront. Let pedestrians have their freedom but take responsibility for safe crossing.
Posted by Marshall Katz, 19/02/2010 6:34:56 AM, on The Herald
1 | 2 | 3  |  next >

post a comment


Screen name  *
Email address  *
Remember me?
Comment  *
 
We invite and encourage our readers to post comments. Comments are moderated and will appear as soon as our editor has approved them. When posting comments you agree to be bound by our Terms and Conditions.

Most popular articles


 
Balance Health Club-Wests Tower
 
Bounce
 
Landcom Sanctuary


Newcastle Herald







Weather brought to you by:

Weatherzone

Classifieds

Front Page

Current Issue
Privacy Policy | Conditions of Use | Advertising Terms | Copyright © 2012. Fairfax Media.
 SEND...
 SAVE...
 SHARE...