News 
 Opinion 
 Letters to the Editor 
 General 
 Stick a label on them 

Stick a label on them

19 Jan, 2012 07:14 AM
TO Bob Irvin (‘‘A new E-plate era around corner’’ Letters 17/1), I’d say that impatient drivers of all ages are aggressive on our roads. While teaching my daughter to drive, her L-plates acted as a red flag to the discourteous, aggressive bullies driving on our roads.

Why pick on the elderly? My 89-year-young father has passed four licence tests since he turned 80, as required by the RMS. Perhaps we need I-plates for the ‘‘I-mpatient’’, selfish drivers who delight in intimidating other road users.

Instead of allowing these dangerous individuals to share the roads, what about licence tests every two years to maintain their right to have a licence? This could start when they have only three points left on their licence. They would be required to display an I-plate to warn other road users. (Note: P-plate drivers get only three points). If we all become more cautious and drive sensibly we can all arrive safely.

Phill Broom, Maryland

Print
Increase Text Size
Decrease Text Size

comments


Date: Newest first | Oldest first
Can only agree, a very sensible idea. There are a few, constantly irrational drivers of all shape, size and capacity vehicles. Let everybody know who to avoid and watch carefully. We have irrational moments but most of us realise driving a car is not the time to let emotions drive our driving.
Posted by short ribs, 19/01/2012 7:50:37 AM, on The Herald
Michael, I find the very worst offenders are the red and green P platers for being impatient by tailgating and chopping in and out of traffic. I think they are the very ones where your suggested I plates should be directed at. After they complete their green P's they move to I's and stay there for at least 5 years and for every time they have a traffic infringement their I probation is extended another year. My bet many would be I drivers for the rest of their life.
Posted by cardiffresident, 19/01/2012 8:10:10 AM, on The Herald
A driving test every two years would be a great idea, providing it tested people for use of indicators where required, and tested their ability to keep left unless overtaking. Commuting from New Lambton to Maitland every day it is clear that these are two major problems affecting traffic flow. I do not care whether you want to go faster, or slower than me, but don't unnecessarily impede other motorists. It is not your business to do so, no matter what you believe to the contrary, especially if traveling at or near the speed limit is beyond your capability.
Posted by StephensonsRocket, 19/01/2012 10:00:25 AM, on The Herald
Why is it that anyone who doesn't like his time wasted by ditherers is always wrong, but people wasting other people's time are always right?
Posted by jackson, 20/01/2012 10:47:21 AM, on The Herald
Labeling their cars, test every 2 yrs would discourage dangerous driving, drink driving, bullying on our roads. Unfortunately, our judicial system is based on leniency; it recognizes offenders socially, intellectually disadvantaged species to protect, not as a threat for public safety. In a way, they are encouraged for repeat offences via lenient sentencing, bail terms; their names are protected if below the age of 18. Drink drivers are given good behavior bonds, a second chance to kill. Aussies get to learn law enforcement overseas. Average 2 Australians a day are arrested around the world.
Posted by FG, 21/01/2012 3:23:54 AM, on The Herald
It worked fine in the old days, get your L's at 16 years and 9 months, and get you P's at 17, get your full license at 18.

We are not killing young ones any faster.

Poeple on P's for 3 years doesn't help, just increases revenue.

Posted by Da Yuehan, 21/01/2012 9:57:11 AM, on The Herald
For god sake not all p platers cut in & out of traffic or tailgate! I'm a green p plater for the car & motorbike & I've dealt with more poor driving from unrestricted drivers than p platers (although there are bad ones in every group). 'I' plates automatically after green p's for 5yrs assumes that all green p plate drivers/riders are impatient - that is a load of BS. Lots of p platers who are just trying to get from A to B doing the right thing have already been punished by the stupid introduction of green p's we dont need more plates.
Posted by Wulf, 21/01/2012 1:35:40 PM, on The Herald
I think the "I" plate would work as long as it has no age or gender restrictions. Forty years ago, when I got my license, P platers had no points. One offense & license gone. I lost mine for no P plates (stolen overnight).

Everyone should take responsibility for their own actions. I also was ten foot tall & bulletproof, I was lucky. No one was injured by my arrogance. My driving now reflects my changed attitudes, a lot of drivers my age still consider themselves bulletproof.

Posted by bluedtf, 21/01/2012 7:53:05 PM, on The Herald
It would be a much fairer system. Why should we only have to prove we’re good drivers when we’re very young or very old? Everyone should have to prove they are still worthy of holding their licence. A drivers licence isn’t a right – just because you fall between the age of 21 and 80 should not mean you are entitled to keep your licence without proving you’re still a competent driver.
Posted by Maitlander, 23/01/2012 10:00:17 AM, on The Herald

post a comment


Screen name  *
Email address  *
Remember me?
Comment  *
 
We invite and encourage our readers to post comments. Comments are moderated and will appear as soon as our editor has approved them. When posting comments you agree to be bound by our Terms and Conditions.

Most popular articles




Newcastle Herald







Weather brought to you by:

Weatherzone

Classifieds

Front Page

Current Issue
Privacy Policy | Conditions of Use | Advertising Terms | Copyright © 2012. Fairfax Media.
 SEND...
 SAVE...
 SHARE...