News 
 Opinion 
 Letters to the Editor 
 General 
 The lycra juggernaut 

The lycra juggernaut

01 Feb, 2010 09:50 AM
I SPEAK to speeding cyclists on Fernleigh Track and their lycra-clad colleagues: you need to understand that, just as you are entitled to use the road and to expect courtesy from cars and trucks, pedestrians (including small children) have the right to use the track and the right to be treated with respect and courtesy.

Cyclists object to speeding cars and trucks intimidating them and forcing them from the road. So why hurtle along like speeding juggernauts around families and little children? Abusing parents to control the movements of toddlers and small children is not acceptable.

Perhaps councils need to introduce a speed limit of 10 kmh on cycle/pedestrian tracks. It would make the Fernleigh Track safer and speed fines could raise revenue to finish it to Swansea.

On the road, the person with the speed has the responsibility for stopping I expect the same applies on the shared walkways. Slow down around others. Children can be unpredictable, so don't speed round them.

Paul Smith

Adamstown Heights

Print
Increase Text Size
Decrease Text Size

comments


Date: Newest first | Oldest first
My husband and I find the same thing happening on the cycle/walkway between Speers Point and Warners Bay. There are some biker riders who come flying up behind and around you so fast its frightening. There is a 10km speed limit on that walkway, please slow down before someone is seriously injured.
Posted by S.W., 2/02/2010 7:15:10 AM, on The Herald
A fair comment, cyclist and pedestrians use the track. good manners and respect for other users costs nothing.
Posted by intouch, 2/02/2010 10:08:01 AM, on The Herald
why the obsession with the fact that some cyclists wear lycra? That comment alone shows your prejudice against those who commute by bike. A 10km/h speed limit is a daft notion because a) you'd fall off the bike going that slow and b) how would you enforce it? The key is mutual courtesy. Just as there are recalcitrant cyclists there are loonie and irresponsible pedestrians. In both cases they are in the minority, thankfully. Abuse is never acceptable, but suggesting to parents that they control the movement of toddlers in a potentially dangerous environment is perfectly acceptable, and frankly shouldn't need to be said if the parents were acting responsibly.
Posted by davey, 2/02/2010 11:57:30 AM, on The Herald
If a 10kmh speed limit is imposed we would have to book joggers too and those little children on their pink bikes with training wheels!! Don't spoil a good argument with a silly solution.
Posted by Den Isles, 2/02/2010 4:34:18 PM, on The Herald
I think if people just use common sence and the "Keep left Unless Overtaking" Everyone should be happy. There is no need to walk 6 abreast and take up the full track and you don't need to let kids / dogs run all over the place, it is a shared path so sharing goes both ways. BUT is saying that, there is no need to ride at 50 or 60km/h down the track, it is not only dangerous for pedestrians, but try coming off your bike at this speeds. A bit of common sence on all sides wouldn't go astray.
Posted by Nafe, 3/02/2010 12:51:10 PM, on The Herald
Newcastle Police have a bike squad. Perhaps they could do routine patrols and prosecute for reckless or furious riding. Legislation exists. Other problems exist justifying routine patrols of the track.
Posted by Bender, 3/02/2010 1:46:01 PM, on The Herald
Yes, the police and rangers could also tell people not to walk six abreast and keep their dogs on shorter leads and also, take those wretched earpieces out so that they hear cyclists bells.
Posted by Muriel, 3/02/2010 8:14:58 PM, on The Herald
They are called bike paths/tracks not walk paths/tracks And if it was not for the cyclist movement these paths would not exist
Posted by dogs, 4/02/2010 9:48:55 AM, on The Herald
At the very least, bells should be made mandatory on bikes so that pedestrians can be warned as they approach. This is a very common law in North America.
Posted by T, 5/02/2010 6:30:55 AM, on The Herald
Serious cyclists are despised by everyone else. We have to live with this fact. When cycling on the Fernleigh track I call out passing when pedestrians are blocking the entire track, but avoid warnings otherwise unless there are loose children or dogs. Ringing bells or calling out tends to cause people to look over their right shoulder and veer right. I have had a few close calls as a result. The need is simply for all users to keep left unless overtaking and to keep children and dogs under control. Speed differentials are just as great between oncoming runners, say 25 kph, as between a passing cyclist and a pedestrian. This is only important if there is a collision and this will only occur if the rules are not followed. My observation is that now the track has been extended the great majority of users over an entire day (rather than just in the early morning period) are cyclists.
Posted by newtus, 5/02/2010 10:54:03 AM, on The Herald
1 | 2  |  next >

post a comment


Screen name  *
Email address  *
Remember me?
Comment  *
 
We invite and encourage our readers to post comments. Comments are moderated and will appear as soon as our editor has approved them. When posting comments you agree to be bound by our Terms and Conditions.

Most popular articles


 
Balance Health Club-Wests Tower
 
Bounce
 
Landcom Sanctuary


Newcastle Herald







Weather brought to you by:

Weatherzone

Classifieds

Front Page

Current Issue
Privacy Policy | Conditions of Use | Advertising Terms | Copyright © 2012. Fairfax Media.
 SEND...
 SAVE...
 SHARE...